Jump to content

Spetnazz

Members
  • Posts

    339
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spetnazz

  1. @DanielRey said in I am Steven, not Steven: Wait ... What's your name again ? Stephen. His name is Stephen.
  2. Okay, but... Why did you leave ThC?
  3. yoko is still a traitor ladrao fdp, kick him
  4. Yes please! Staying on a roof is boring as fuck, and it doesn't make any sense either. It's usually cops inside the actual store, while all the crims are gathering on the roof like a bunch of pigeons. I'd be happy to take any changes at the moment.
  5. Moneydrain idea; Let players buy radios for a lump of money, so they can play music like the admins. Maybe put a timer on it, so it works as a lease. $5.000.000 for having a radio for 1 hour or whatever. Don't even start with the "bUt PeOpLE cAnT bEhAvE"-shit, as I know some of you will do. We have vehicles with swastikas driving around the map, it can't get any more out of control than that anyway. If people don't want to listen to it, they can turn it off in their sound-settings
  6. @DROT said in Vehicle-Respawn: I wonder if you'd be happier if explosions were disabled in close proximity of bank entrance, like it is at SR. ^ This. Much better alternative imo.
  7. My suggestion for this; As well as non-explodable. Better yes no?
  8. @subjoi said in Vehicle-Respawn: Which part of the following: wait a while until it's reviewed & added. is hard to understand? Why is it wrong to have a script developed and ready for public launch before reviewing it? "Reviewing" in this case most likely involving a community poll. Write script and make sure it works > community poll > public launch sounds like solid work flow in my opinion. Do you really and truly believe, that once the script is done, they'll be asking US for OUR opinions. And if we vote no, they'll discard the script? Do you also believe in aliens?
  9. @JohnnyEnglish said in Vehicle-Respawn: A script has been developed for this by @Scorpyo, respawning vehicles in close proximity of Bank Marker, wait a while until it's reviewed & added. I read a lot of "Is this really necessary?" posts in lower-priority suggestion threads, and that's exactly my reaction to this... Is it really necessary? How big of a problem is it, that there are vehicles in close proximity of the bank marker?
  10. @Tombaa said in Allowing the players to take the inactive admins' props.: @sila said in Allowing the players to take the inactive admins' props.: Last I remember you technically always could, by either contacting SAHA leader, or by contacting the inactive/retired admin yourself, and getting permission from them to sell the house to you or someone. wANTy let me buy his mansion a few years ago like a nice fella. This is correct I want all your properties
  11. @Ammar said in Yet Another Hackerman Thread: imagine getting banned for using a trainer Imagine kidnapping Americans in your sparetime. You're no better, Ammar!
  12. To whoever this might concern: Yoko is a traitor, and despite his latest post, I am NOT a fan. Sorry for disturbing your media archive. Traitor thief fdp
  13. "Special Thanks to these following tunisians who made that shit happen:" -> Tags @HasomY who's from Sudan. But I guess he can be Tunisian if he want. A Tunisian rickshaw driver?
  14. No. They earn plenty, and they don't even have to use their tasers and nightsticks during BRs. Don't they get money for kill-arresting the crims? The reward itself should be that all criminals attending the BR gets stars, hence increasing the chance of cops earning a lot of money by arresting. Let me get this straight; If I spawn as a trainee, go to a BR and use /wank the entire time, I should get paid if the other cops manages to stop the BR? At least if you don't defend as a crim during a BR, you'll either be 1) Arrested or 2) Killed by the BRing gang.
  15. @Tut-Greco said in getting money everywhere at br: add 15% increase for defenders at the corridor :crazypepe: Why stop at 15?! 25!
  16. Totally agree. I think I get paid in 1 of 10 BRs I attend, simply because I don't go to the safe-area. I'm not really there for the money anyway, but I can imagine that it must be annoying for those who are
  17. Polat: How do I best illustrate the situation of BRs?.. Hmm.. Wait, I got it!
  18. @Ramby said in Bring spacebar back when getting tasered: Instead of just pressing 'space bar' maybe a combination of mulitple keys to press? "Press A E S F 3 2 4 1 P to escape"
  19. @Groove said in HLS: January Bank Status: @Tritosh said in HLS: January Bank Status: All those failed BRs from TT were organised by @Groove he is part of HLS et a, c'est ta mre? @Tritosh Could at least have blurred out my action. Now everyone knows that I'm poor, and only survive on this server because I can use TT's money :(
  20. @Kain said in Revive Gang Robs: @Ammar said in Revive Gang Robs: @Harmy said in Revive Gang Robs: Forcing level 3+ gangs to have a gang safe that in return will only make gangs to keep below the limit money in gang if they dont want to participate kinda makes no sense. Dont include suggestions on how gangs will have to change their ways with their gang accounts, thats none of your business. If gangs see value and want to participate in GRs they will need and have a safe. If not they simply wontt have it It would be a fair trade off though. If you dont want to have a safe, then you should not be able to use the gang bank. Adding to that, it is already similar to what you described, gangs currently dont participate GRs because they choose the safe route of not having a gang safe at all because they see GR as an activity shrouded with the misbelief of report wars and such. By forcing them to have a safe, it would prevent the luxury of having tens of millions of dollars sitting in a gang bank with no threat, and consequently maybe entice them to try out GRs? Personally, I like the activity of GR, and I dislike gangs that keep the activity dead by choosing not to have a safe at all. I specifically pointed out level 3+ gangs because they spawn with sufficient weaponry to be able to defend their safe. It should be so that you can only rob gangs of the same level or above so a level 5 gang can't bully a level 2 gang in terms of numbers. Wtf? I want to rob Z, it's not my fault that they didn't get to level 5. I don't like your idea. Downvoted and blacklisted for further comments.
×
×
  • Create New...