@Teddy said in Organization level acceptance: Yes and no; I don't enjoy it, but be careful what you wish for. With no media posts requirements, levels are based more on opinions than facts, so whether you get accepted or not; or demoted or not, will largely depend on whether the GMs are your friends, or not. Worse if they're your enemies. Like it was in the past. I strongly support this sentiment and anyone who is a HQ of an official group will know with the activity check, it's something myself and Jay very clearly laid out. We'd rather do the activity checks but if the majority of groups agreed they do not want to do it, that is fine but it would be entirely our personal opinion and you would not have grounds to argue. The GM system as it is now is flawed, everyone knows this - there are things like adminjails which are extremely flawed in the way they are calculated. There is no maximum amount you can get because it changes every month and that maximum figure is the same for everyone, irrespective of organisation size. This is a flawed part of the current system but I digress. The media is fairly bang on in terms of being immune to personal opinion. It's the same for active members counts. I prefer the GM team operating based on numbers and statistics (even if often misused or mis-attributed) as opposed to working purely on gut instinct. That only got us trouble in the past and often an organisation could go from being viewed as positive to negative in the swing of a month due to a change of personnel in GM.