Yes and no; I don't enjoy it, but be careful what you wish for. With no media posts requirements, levels are based more on opinions than facts, so whether you get accepted or not; or demoted or not, will largely depend on whether the GMs are your friends, or not. Worse if they're your enemies. Like it was in the past. I don't know what the requirements are though, since they're 'hidden', however, ThC posts almost exclusively turfs and our own bankrobs (occasionally roleplays or br assists) daily or every 2 or 3 days - if this wasn't enough then I would agree it's too much, but considering no complaints from GMs I see it as fine. Some gangs like C and X and TT like to race for most media posts, others don't, meh. As long as an active gang doesn't get warned, or an active gang doesn't get denied an acceptance because of medias, its fine. There was a time a few months ago where AA got warned for their media archive which was very stupid because they were also the most active gang at the same time (over RPs, I think?) but looks like things have improved, or idk. Main point is, you wouldn't like a opinion-based system when you find out the new GM is someone who doesn't like you very much (AA 2017), or someone who prefers certain gangs like their own even if they don't do that much (cough 2016 SoA), because you're gonna end up harassed any way. There should be a visible balance as to what the requirements are. I don't think gangs should be compared because gangs like C raise the average for everyone else with their 600 posts a month, for example. That's definitely a change that needs to be made. The 'as an average of level 5 gangs' thing needs to go.