Jump to content

Dinaz

SAES Community Staff
  • Posts

    998
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Dinaz last won the day on May 9

Dinaz had the most liked content!

About Dinaz

  • Birthday 24/04/2004

My Information

  • Discord ID
    dinaz_

Recent Profile Visitors

3,902 profile views

Dinaz's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Well Followed Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Dedicated
  • First Post

Recent Badges

1.5k

Reputation

  1. No no, I myself was never against ideas for cops to have their own fair share to start their own activities that they would be able to start and even allow crims to parttake in, that’s absolutely a great idea, but I simply mentioned the part where I disagreed with. Allowing both sides to have different activties to initiate would tremendously help both sides find their own interests rather than one side solely relying on the other side to start particular activities. We’ve seen how it affected turfs, crims would unite together to defeat police raids, kinda needs more policing rules wise but still, a good improvement whatsoever. So yes, with that, I completely agree with you.
  2. @bazuka36 if you were to nerf a group, a major nerf would just kill the whole side. Buffs and nerfs throughout the time were sequential, and even when they were minor, they drastically affected a whole side, either by morale or by gameplay disadvantages. So while I do understand your cause to the nerf, it still wouldn't make sense to take away the whole perk, but that's just my opinion
  3. @bazuka36 didn't read everything but I must agree, cops nowadays would wish to stop every single BR there is and would be frustrated if it doesn't go their way, this shouldn't be the case. I would rather have 10 BRs a day and actively participate on trying to stop them, even if we fail stopping all 10, rather than having 1 BR a day that we can stop and that's it. HLS at LV/SF banks is still not much of a disadvantage and believe me when I say that, people have developed advanced methods of defending rather than the blind defending that you used to see(which made stopping it possible back in the day even without HLS). Only nerf that could be applied should be the stim, make it drug-speed-level or vending-speed-level but the perk remains the same, can be activated using the cmd(makes HLS worth the hassle atleast)
  4. This is not a time for an exclusivity for BRs & CRs, that was long due. With the current player count, the remaining players SHOULD have the right to start their own bank robberies without relying on 5 cops activity quota. It will for sure take away that exclusivity feature, but people will atleast not hesitate to BR anymore(Maybe lower the quota drastically for CRs). Slow doors were invented because people got too good at cracking collectively (5 good crackers at once can end a BR in less than a minute without slow doors), but I don't think that matters anymore considering most of which have went inactive. And remember, we don't have to be able to stop every BR there is. Some are just beyond stopping and that is completely normal. I have always seen the BR more appealing when TRYING to stop it, not actually stopping it. Even solo, you could wear your night goggles, flash and push in. (Applicable in county banks mostly, city banks are almost impossible to rush in solo unless you lag too good)
  5. Then don't jump brother hhhhh, simple
  6. Accidents happen, that is very much understandable. However, if we start to deem that invalid due to intention, then we will not be able to differentiate between a legitimate accident and a rulebreak on purpose. If you, for example, were shooting a cop, and a crim happened to run in front of you or just happened to be nearby and died from your gunshots, we will never truly know whether you meant it on purpose or you truly were shooting the cop. People can fake their intentions which leads us to get rid of the compassion and act based on the proof we have. I know it is frustrating, and I have been there plenty of times, and I was even punished for those accidents a couple of times before without actually meaning it, but it is what it is really. At the end of the day, you're just gonna spend a couple of seconds in adminjail and continue your game being more careful. If you did offer an arrest after an avoid and the player refuses it and reports, it is still within his rights. Why? Because we get back to the initial factor, intention. Some people can literally just get themselves killed so they can get the option to /sur in hospital, or just to piss off the police officer, or for whatever other reason... This for is without denying that there are genuine people who do happen to end up in unfortunate cases, like yourself probably, but yeah, it is what it is.
  7. This has been moved to Discord.
  8. Dinaz

    Fuck you retard.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. Crank

      Crank

      Dinaz quit the rabid dog act honestly

    3. Hesha

      Hesha

      Kinda gay but fine

    4. Dinaz

      Dinaz

      Who wrote ts 🥀🥀🥀

  9. Request denied, player is part of the SAES clan.
  10. Request denied, player is part of the SAES clan.
  11. Request denied. User is an admin.
  12. A week with no bids, archived
  13. ok
  14. We can all agree that this is not the way to improve the experience whatsoever. Infinity summarized it best: The server needs updates. Updates that would allow people who retired to come back to take a look atleast and maybe stick around for the good of nostalgia? Updates that would allow players who login for a minute spend more time around. More single player focused classes (and maybe fulfill the current ones that still don't have a script). A tutorial for the newbies to interact with the server on their own, without watching a 48minutes tutorial or reading an essay from F1/another player to tell them what to do. But even that may not matter much as the game itself is dying, we have to face it.
  15. Archived
×
×
  • Create New...