I know letting squads turf was suggested before, but that was before the implementation of the hourly increasing payout for a zone you're holding.
Currently, there are 2 sides, one is outnumbered at the moment resulting in 1 side holding these zones for days if not weeks allowing them to farm free money. It's only logical to allow cops from stopping these gangs and "turf" a zone to stabilize it so no one owns it Including the squad that has just stabalized the zone.
Arresting is a complicated case here, personally, I wouldn't want to allow it since it ruins the fun, battle it out under.
Question
Lincoln
I know letting squads turf was suggested before, but that was before the implementation of the hourly increasing payout for a zone you're holding.
Currently, there are 2 sides, one is outnumbered at the moment resulting in 1 side holding these zones for days if not weeks allowing them to farm free money. It's only logical to allow cops from stopping these gangs and "turf" a zone to stabilize it so no one owns it Including the squad that has just stabalized the zone.
Arresting is a complicated case here, personally, I wouldn't want to allow it since it ruins the fun, battle it out under.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
19 answers to this question
Recommended Posts