YAY SAES IS +18 TIME TO SHARE DIRTY SHIT

Thanks kind sirs )))))))))))

Considering that attacking from outside is obviously participating actively in a turf war you should be allowed to kill anyone doing so. I don't think the "Either the attacker or the defender must be in the turf zone at the time of engaging" should be removed but reworded so it's clear you are not supposed to attack people who are on their way to the turf area but you are free to attack those who are already taking part actively (attacking already). Plus we don't get to face situations like in BC where people go walking to the turf and shoot eachother before even arriving to the zone, then cry.

Atleast tell them to stop posting this stupid shit on forums especially in ramadan, last warning or we leave forums for month

That video is impressive

@liyones said in SAES Meme Pictures V2:

Removed...

@Immortal I know you don't want to force anything on anyone, but still, it's a way to indirect force people to spawn and respond and we have had several discussions about this already and it won't go ahead. It's not something that will be done aslong as an alternative exists, I'm pretty sure. AFK system is something that was implemented recently, which hasn't been assesed live properly yet and therefore is still subject to change.

@Durby rule is pretty much recent so I doubt if has been enforced at all yet. There won't be any task force, just like there is not a task force to guarantee you don't get deathmatched and the reason reporting exists. Guaranteeing something is something I cannot do.

If there is an indicator or a counter for AFK people that will depend on the development team and if this is finally seen as something necesary.

We don't maneuver the conversation as we keep listening to what people has to say and try to adapt it. Sadly, we cannot make a change and then make another one the next day, as the impact of the changes needs to be assessed. Until now, those gangs which have applied for new levels have complied with the requirements and even exceeded them, so I don't think (as for now) any gang would face requirements or activities as a problem. There are things that need a change? Maybe, but going once and again over the same topic without new approaches will lead us nowhere, if you can understand.