There is currently a vote going on within the senate to remove Billionaire from office, currently 7 senators have voted in favour of this motion. Should 3 more senators vote in favour of this motion, he will be removed with a new election held for the position of President and Vice President.

Should Billionaire be impeached by his own senate, he will not be allowed run in any election for the forseeable future.

Should you have a dog in this race, I suggest contacting your senators to urge them to vote in the way you want them to vote.

Appreciate the topic, will have some discussion around it.

You don't need to re-install MTA, just delete your resources folder so you re-download the login resource when you connect.

@ChasinTLSN

Hey,

If you fail to see why hitting unwanted criminals with a nightstick and throwing multiple flashbangs at them is not "interfering with other users gameplay in a negative way" then there is no necessity to continue this conversation, as that is very clearly an action which falls within the quoted rule.

On the whole while you are entitle to take issue with or debate the severity of punishment you received, what you did was clearly not the correct thing to do.

The one take away from this is that the term "abusing" is applied over-liberally and should not of been used in your reason for adminjailing. This of course does not however undermine the legitimacy of the punishment.

After discussing this within the community staff leadership team we consider this case closed, with no reprimand being given.

I appreciate the time you took to make this report and the candor you did it with.

Cheers!

Hey Shadro,

Rule #5 refers to verbal abuse, not abuse of in-game mechanics, this is covered by rule #3, rule #9 etc.

Therefore your breakdown on why you didn't break the rule around abuse would be somewhat void - as that's not the reason you seem to have been jailed.

In your report you admit to hitting players with your nightstick and 'trolling' them as you put it.

You have also said you threw a flashbang in a bank full of players who you knew were not wanted, and you did so twice - with the second being a misclick.

This would fall under the following rule/guideline;

With this in mind, would you argue that your actions of hitting unwanted players with your nightstick and throwing a flashbang into a group of players you know not to be wanted is not "interfering with other users gameplay in a negative way, which is not an intended part of the game"

From our perspective, flashbangs were not added with the intention to use or harass unwanted criminals with them.

The nightstick was also not added to be used to beat unwanted criminals.

Before going forward I'd like to hear your defense for the rule/guideline you actually were found in breach of.

Thanks!