@Joshbond said in Senator By-Election:

@Brophy said in Senator By-Election:

@Zekeriya said in Senator By-Election:

@Brophy said in Senator By-Election:

But running around san andreas killing and killing people entering the mosque is realistic, right?

DM is also realistic...

I know, I was dmed 3 times today on my way to screwfix to get some trunking, luckly respawning is real too

Was it essential travel though? Need to keep to our guidelines brophy

Was essential for me yes, as interpreted by Dominic Cummings and screwfix do social distancing click and collect

@Zekeriya said in Senator By-Election:

@Brophy said in Senator By-Election:

But running around san andreas killing and killing people entering the mosque is realistic, right?

DM is also realistic...

I know, I was dmed 3 times today on my way to screwfix to get some trunking, luckly respawning is real too

If sides was balanced yeah, but look at the ratio of cops to criminals on the server at the moment, would be stupid to implement at this time.

But running around san andreas killing and killing people entering the mosque is realistic, right?

You did it to yourself, now live with the consequences

Can't you just edit this yourself in the MTA keybind settings

We are already looking into it as mentioned as the topic has already been brought up in this category.

We've just got @Scorpyo on board who is smashing bugs at the moment and plan on recruiting more developers.

As mentioned previously, we monitor all aspects of the server, we have not seen any issues, spikes or any other indicators that would suggest the issue is serverside, we've looked at cpu loading/timings especially as the mta server runs on a single core, memory, hdd bottlenecking, cpu temperature (in case of throttling), network capacity/usage and alot more and can't see any issues, hence why we are looking at clientside loading now.

Closing this thread, please refer to the one already created.

Here's an idea, don't like epic games, don't use it.

@Spetnazz said in Default Deagle V2.0:

The whole "We wont look into it"-thing, seems like a weird way of saying "We honestly dont know what's wrong with it". Nanobob looked into it, and this is his input on the matter;

So I mean.. They obviously DID look into it. No offense to anyone, but eh.. Would've been easier just to say that the shit is so broken, that you cant find the issue

There's a difference between "we" looking at it and @NanoBob having a quick look at it off his own bat cuz you've pmed him about it.

EDIT: If people find their posts missing, its obviously because it's not on topic, there is a difference between giving constructive criticism and just being a sarcastic mong and adding no value to the topic.

In spite of the vote, we will not be looking at this at this time.

But here is a recommendation for your next suggestion, don't come in a topic with your merry band of toxic retards slagging us off then cry when we don't do your suggestion.