@Assassin Granted, but you're hired as our part-time Janitor with no benefits and a pay of $4.50 an Hour
I want to become a respected member of community.
Granted, but you're assigned to the Bayside Port of Entry which has zero activity
I wish for upgraded Fire Equipment for the SAFD and my Battalion.
This is a really nice piece of work you've done @Filex
If done properly it could seriously change the player experience within SAES..as they'll be able to increase their own specs as they won't need to load in the shit-ton of mods SAES has..(in hindsight).
You'd have to change the rule of where unwanted criminals can kill a cop in the jail zone than...
Cops are allowed to kill unwanted criminals due to the fact it could lead to the start of a jailbreak. if you want this suggestion added - you'll have to make it for BOTH sides and not just the cops..
And to note on that marker protection...when you enter the markers you have a brief second or two where you can NOT move at all due to loading into the interior. With there being little to no time on the protection - that small hiccup if loading in is more than enough for a group of criminals to camp it with the weapons. Furthermore take into account that theres a possibility of getting pushed back by a Spaz and/or Sniper bullet that causes the targeted ped to take a step backwards and be unable to target or fire...
So if we look at the statistics you can,see where the market killing should he disallowed due to the unfair nature of it. An easy solution would be to increase, or actually add, the marker protecfion buff to the jail..not a high number where a warden can,abuse it but enough to where players with the bad connections and such have a fighting chance.
On the flip-side yes the criminals will say "Oh but you have a taser and nightstick so use that you fools" Right why didnt we think of that? We have enough time to enter the marker (mind you with NO protection as you can see in the photos the dead ped is floating - meaning they haven't fully loaded into the jail yet to even MOVE) and run up to a criminal to whack with the baton - in that amount of time the gaggle of 5 or so criminals can just obliterate the cops with a range advantage and the luck factor of a first round sniper/spaz forcing their target still for a brief interlude.
As the second officer involved during this, let me give my viewpoint if you don't mind kind sir.
The jailbreak was completed and officers were moving away from the area. I stopped once I saw Tut near the area and was getting ready to just leave the area when I spotted you on the rooftops of the adjacent apartment complex. I opened fire on you as you started shooting at me - so to be fair you opened fire FIRST, officers were NOT chasing you and a JB was NOT ongoing. To go with a statement Tut said - "How could you start a JB from that far of a distance?" < How do you intend to start a new jailbreak....when you're on top of the apartment complex? You are not technically inside the jail perimeter and hence had no regulation to kill me.
Tut was inside his car the entire time and never made an attempt to open fire on you from my view - so you killed a 2nd cop who wasn't chasing you. Yes, I was in the jail area but how do you know my intentions? You're a good guy and all but you just made a simple mistake - we all do. I apologize for using the F-bomb towards you but the breach was over with for a good period of time...I get it if you were like on the road or down from the jail and wanted a clear shot to the jail itself - but on top of the apartments has no logical thinking dude. Tut was inside his vehicle getting ready to leave as the SAPA Guidelines doesn't give them the regulation to idle at the jail to try and bait criminals...lastly, if you wanted to start a JB why would you do it from such a far distance, take for example that myself or Tut could respawn as Prison Wardens and rush you - as the amount of time it takes for you to run down and jump the wall is more than enough to arrest you outside or inside the holding area.
@J-Garcia I suggested something similar, using an armored transit vehicle for both sides to give them something new...but it's always nice to see a different spin on things. It allows us as players to see new and exciting elements in an open forum.
Roleplay №: 57
Description: We had a call from ZIP Construction and San Andreas Railroad and Transit Authority to deliver some new equipment to their worksites. Due to it being such a large amount of cargo I put a call out for some help - thankfully two applicants were nearby. We planned out our route to hit the ZIP Construction site first and then transport the transit railcars.
Participants: Applicant Zeno ( @Zeno ) and Applicant m7 ( @M7mDGr7 )
Screenshots: https://imgur.com/a/pnxIQw7
To answer your question, if cops are chasing you and the suspect (you) kill multiple officers before they're able to get close...you type /sur to immediately get a lower jail sentence. In real life, if you surrender after committing a crime you very seldom get a reduced sentence.
What he's trying to explain is that - If a SUSPECT was to run from police, and verbal commands are issued and the suspect DOES NOT STOP - and the SUSPECT goes about killing more cops before a cop can get close enough to taze, the suspect will type /sur to get more than half of their sentence gone because of one command. Why the hell should we give you a lower sentence because you surrendered after high crimes?
The reason we taze is very simple - to get you the full sentence if you try to avoid it. If you surrender during a role-play (like at a SAI checkpoint or traffic stop) than sure that's reasonable for a lower sentence as you're complying...not reasonable for the prior scenarios.